top of page

Indonesia vs Malaysia Type Approval: DJID and SIRIM Requirements Compared

  • Nano Regulatory Team
  • 5 days ago
  • 4 min read

Indonesia and Malaysia are both important markets for manufacturers of wireless, radio, and telecommunications equipment. However, getting products approved in these two countries involves different regulatory steps.

While both markets require local representation and product labelling, Indonesia places greater focus on its certification route and local testing requirements, whereas Malaysia generally relies more heavily on internationally accredited test documentation.

Understanding these differences before starting an application can help manufacturers choose the right compliance approach and avoid unnecessary delays.


Indonesia and Malaysia at a Glance

Requirement

Indonesia – DJID

Malaysia – SIRIM

Regulatory Authority

DJID

MCMC

Certification Body

DJID

SIRIM QAS International

Approval

DJID Type Approval

SIRIM Type Approval / CoC

Local Representative

Required

Required

Local Testing

Applicable depending on route

Generally not required

Samples

2 samples where local testing applies

Not required

International Reports

Accepted under applicable MRA route

Generally accepted

SAR

Local testing required when applicable

International accredited reports generally accepted

Validity

3 years

5 years

Labelling

Required

Required

Typical Timeline

10–14 weeks

4–8 weeks


Indonesia: DJID Type Approval

Indonesia's telecommunications and radio equipment market is regulated by the Directorate General of Digital Infrastructure (DJID), previously known as SDPPI.

Products that use radio frequency or connect to a public telecommunications network require DJID Type Approval before they can be imported, distributed, or sold in Indonesia.

One of the first things manufacturers need to consider is the local representative. The application must be submitted by an Indonesian company holding a valid Business Registration Number (NIB). This company acts as the certificate holder and remains involved in regulatory compliance and certificate maintenance.

Two Routes Are Available

Indonesia provides two certification approaches.

Paperwork Route

Where eligible, manufacturers can use test reports issued by Indonesian-accredited MRA laboratories. This can avoid local RF and safety/EMC testing.

However, there is an important limitation: overseas SAR reports are not accepted.

Local Testing Route

Under this route, the required testing is performed at Indonesian laboratories accredited and recognized by DJID.

Where local testing applies, two samples are required.

For products requiring SAR testing, the SAR test must be conducted locally in Indonesia regardless of which certification route is selected.

Indonesia Key Points

  • Certificate validity: 3 years

  • Local representative: Required

  • Typical lead time: 10–14 weeks

  • Samples: 2 where local testing applies

  • Labelling: Mandatory

  • Exempt devices: None stated

  • Local SAR testing: Mandatory when applicable

Approved products must carry the applicable DJID Certificate Number and PLG ID. Packaging must also include the required QR code, warning sign, and compliance statement.


Malaysia: SIRIM Type Approval

Malaysia follows a different structure.

The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) is responsible for telecommunications regulation and technical requirements, while SIRIM QAS International manages the Malaysia Type Approval certification process.

Communications and radio equipment generally requires SIRIM Type Approval and a Certificate of Conformity (CoC) before it can be imported, marketed, distributed, installed, or used in Malaysia, unless specifically exempted.

The scope covers products such as mobile phones, tablets, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth equipment, IoT devices, wireless communication equipment, CPE, satellite terminals, RFID equipment, short-range devices, and other radio transmitters and receivers.

A More Documentation-Focused Process

A major difference from Indonesia is Malaysia's approach to existing test documentation.

Manufacturers can generally submit accredited international RF, EMC, safety, and SAR test reports, provided the reports meet applicable MCMC technical requirements.

As a result, local testing is not necessarily required when suitable international reports are available.

The application still requires a registered local representative, and approved products must carry the required SIRIM certification label.

Malaysia Key Points

  • Certificate validity: 5 years

  • Local representative: Required

  • Typical lead time: 4–8 weeks

  • Samples: Not required

  • Labelling: Mandatory

  • International test reports: Generally accepted

  • Local testing: Generally not required with acceptable reports


Where the Two Systems Differ Most

The biggest difference appears when looking at testing and existing compliance evidence.

A manufacturer entering Indonesia needs to determine whether its available reports support the paperwork route or whether local testing will be necessary. SAR introduces an additional requirement because applicable SAR testing must take place in Indonesia.

Malaysia can be more straightforward for manufacturers that already have suitable international test reports. Recognized accredited documentation can generally be used to support the SIRIM application without local testing.

Area

Indonesia DJID

Malaysia SIRIM

Testing approach

Route-dependent

Primarily documentation-based

Overseas test reports

Accepted under applicable MRA route

Generally accepted if compliant

Local SAR

Required when applicable

International reports generally accepted

Samples

2 for applicable local testing

Not required

Certificate period

3 years

5 years

Typical approval time

10–14 weeks

4–8 weeks


Which Market May Be Easier?

The answer largely depends on the manufacturer's existing compliance documentation.

If a product already has comprehensive internationally accredited RF, EMC, safety, and SAR reports, Malaysia may provide a simpler path, particularly because local testing is generally not required where acceptable reports are available.

Indonesia requires more attention to the available certification route. Products requiring SAR also need local SAR testing, which can affect both project planning and timelines.

Another consideration is certificate validity. Malaysia provides a five-year validity period, compared with three years in Indonesia.

However, both markets require manufacturers to establish local representation and comply with national labelling requirements.


Planning for Both Markets

Manufacturers targeting Indonesia and Malaysia should avoid treating the two approvals as interchangeable.

Instead, begin with a product-specific review covering:

  1. Wireless technologies and frequency bands

  2. RF, EMC and safety requirements

  3. SAR applicability

  4. Existing test reports and their laboratory accreditation

  5. Local representative requirements

  6. Labelling obligations

  7. Expected certification timeline

This approach makes it easier to determine which existing compliance documents can be reused and where additional country-specific requirements may apply.


Final Takeaway

Indonesia DJID and Malaysia SIRIM both provide established routes for bringing telecommunications and radio equipment into their respective markets, but the practical experience can be quite different.

Indonesia requires closer attention to certification route selection, local testing, and SAR requirements, while Malaysia generally offers a more documentation-led process where internationally accredited reports are available.

For manufacturers with suitable international test documentation, Malaysia may offer the shorter route, with a typical timeline of 4–8 weeks and a five-year certificate validity.

Indonesia, meanwhile, typically requires 10–14 weeks, with certificates valid for three years, and local SAR testing remains mandatory where applicable.

The right strategy is therefore not simply to compare the two markets, but to review the product and its existing compliance documentation first. This can help manufacturers identify the appropriate approval route, reduce unnecessary testing, and plan their market entry more effectively.

Comments


bottom of page